Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judas (manga)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 05:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Judas (manga)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and tagged as such since 2009. I have attempted AtD's and all have been reverted with no further changes. The present article objectively fails all notability standards, but it appears the community insists on a full AfD, so here we go. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WITHDRAWN BY NOMINATOR--As another editor has noted, there has been a Heymann rewrite on this article which establishes notability and brings it up to WP standard. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; this article meets WP:NBOOK with the three reviews listed in the external links section (Comic Book Bin, Sequential Tart, Mania), all of which are from reliable sources per WP:ANIME/RS. The article is poor but deletion is not cleanup. Link20XX (talk) 01:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, a review exists in Jason Thompson's Manga: The Complete Guide (page 598 in my digital version), thus giving it four good sources. Link20XX (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How many of those meet WP:RS? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of them. Their reliability was all discussed just for them to be listed at ANIME/RS. Not to mention Manga: The Complete Guide is a published work that has been widely used throughout other articles; its author is also well-noted for his work in the industry. Link20XX (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just completely re-wrote the entire article with sources and a shorter plot summary. Link20XX (talk) 03:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources provided by Link are sufficient to meet NBOOK. Jumpytoo Talk 03:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In addition to reasons above, WP:HEY is achieved, the article is in a much better state thanks to Link20XX and likely would not be nominated at this point. —siro χ o 04:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.