Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee Debt Coalition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 21:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jubilee Debt Coalition[edit]

Jubilee Debt Coalition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very promotional article; the article for the USA equivalent, was jut deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee USA Network DGG ( talk ) 03:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason
Jubilee Scotland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep -- This was a very notable and successful campaign. Unfortunately, some of the implementation of its achievements may have been less satsifactory. Notability is not temporary. Possibly the organisation might be merged with its campaign, but plain deletion should not be an option. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 13:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.