Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juba Kalamka
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 11:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Juba Kalamka[edit]
- Juba Kalamka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Artist fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems to pass WP:GNG, especially the google news search.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 17:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 2. Snotbot t • c » 18:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good deal of secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Premise of AFD seems flawed since there is a lot of media coverage.--Larrybob (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.