Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Coll-Barreu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Coll-Barreu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion was declined on the grounds this was not obvious enough, but this is still obvious WP:PROMO and the subject very clearly fails WP:GNG (of the sources in the article, the link at the top is clearly a biography provided by the subject, the first proper ref does not mention him by name at all, and the others are all entries about buildings with "Text description provided by the architects"... Looking for other stuff does not yield any convincing examples either) and WP:NOTCV (because that is what this reads like, a CV...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Spain. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can find stuff written by this person, but not stuff written about this person that isn't autobiography. There just isn't independent sourcing for a biography available. And an account named Archimad (talk · contribs) writing about an architect who teaches in Madrid does suggest autobiography here as well, as does xem knowing about NCSU when it isn't mentioned in the published autobiography sourced to the company that xe hyperlinked in the article at Special:Diff/1018288192. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.