Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ju Ju Wilson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ as it does not appear more discussion is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 20:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ju Ju Wilson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A gnews search yields 1 hit. Australian search engine trove comes up mainly with small 1 line mentions. Does not meet WP:ARTIST. Hardly any articles link to this. LibStar (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - LibStar, I think there is a possibility that this Indigenous Australian elder artist is notable. She is in the collection of the National Gallery of Australia (added that info + citation to the article.) We need more than one notable collection to pass NARTIST, but I'm also finding a few hits on her work as a director. Not ready to !vote yet without deeper inquiry. Netherzone (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Also mentioned in this book [1] but it's a snippet view. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the National Gallery of Australia holdings and other sources (and as an author and television appearances). Randy Kryn (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need more discussion over sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.