Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozef G. Lenders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that there is insufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jozef G. Lenders[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article about a media person that tries to hide the fact that it fails the basic criteria for notability with an overwhelming amount of blown up, repeatedly mentioned sources for trivial biographical informations. Ben Ben (talk) 11:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Having trouble finding any English language coverage from RS's. Article's creator seems to be producing a number of BLPs of questionable notability. NickCT (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

strong keep - The subject produced multiple recognized movies and the movie has its own wikipedia page as well. The subject has been awarded with multiple awards and they are not repetition, if you watch carefully they are for different movies. He has received multiple awards from same organization doesn't mean he is not notable. The article surely needs better referencing, I am working on it. The subject also has IMDB profile which clearly shows the awards he has won. Lord Subro (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Jozef meets three points in the creative professional category of Wikipedia notability People page. In that 2.3 he meets point 1 and in point 3, he has written and made featur-lenght film as well. Also his stories are in websites like gutenberg. Also his film were shown in exhibition as well. Lord Subro (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC) — Formated Ben Ben (talk)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - could not find any articles about him. His awards don't seem notable enough; for example the Florida ones are specifically for films produced in Florida and it seems this is the main criteria. Maybe I'm wrong, the Telly awards don't appear that notable, this here was a little disconcerting. —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak keep He has received notable awards.~~ SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 11:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Which one would you consider notable and why? --Ben Ben (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC) PS: Welcome to Wikipedia.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.