Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journo's diary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Journo's diary[edit]

No sources. Non-notable author. Only links to this article were from Bridget Jones's Diary and Adrian Mole and Ben Elton, the author of this article having written weasel statements to link the works. User repeatedly removed valid tags from article, and restored the weasel statements to the other articles, suggesting a conflict of interest. Drat (Talk) 00:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - only 41 GHits, and none of them appear reliable. --Haemo 00:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Haemo. Fails WP:BK badly; vanity press book (sold on Vanity Press Distributors!) whose author is non-notable to the point that he hasn't even bothered to plonk down $15 for a domain name. Wikipedia is not for getting attention; it's for things that have already got attention from reliable sources. --Charlene 01:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable author and no reliable sources. Oysterguitarist~Talk 03:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capperi, ma ke male vi ha fatto? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZioPera (talk • contribs) 07:56, June 23, 2007 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.