Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journeyman Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Journeyman Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Many of the films this company has distributed have some notability, but does that make the distribution company itself notable? I did find some small articles about the company here and here, but they seem like standard press release stuff. If a kept decision is made, I would suggest a disambiguation page to differentiate this Uk based distribution company from Paul Mezey's NY based Journeyman Pictures, a production company that was responsible for the award winning Beasts of the Southern Wild.ABF99 (talk) 16:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure but maybe delete for now - I found several results for the films (see here) but I'm not entirely sure if this company article can be improved and I found more results here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

country initial:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

country name(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

founder:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

formats:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now -Not finding enough reliable sources to establish notability. ABF99 (talk) 01:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.