Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey to the Rock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and redirect, already listed at List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. Pastordavid (talk) 23:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Journey to the Rock[edit]
- Journey to the Rock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fancruft, unreferenced, little or no contextual material. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 07:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's nothing in this article besides an infobox and some text from the book's credits and back cover! If there's something more to say about this book, it might stand a chance; like this, though... Zetawoof(ζ) 07:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Zetawoof. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 12:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Merge into List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. BOZ (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Merge into List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. (In other words, I agree with BOZ.) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Merge into List of Dungeons & Dragons modules. This seems the most sensible option. There's not nearly enough information on this adventure to meet notability standards on its own, but a list of all D&D modules would be a helpful part of Wikipedia. Some of the most important ones should probably get their own entry, but this clearly isn't one of those. Iquander (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.