Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of paramedic practice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 13:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of paramedic practice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by article creator without reason given. None of the references added confer any notability (none really seem to be independent either). PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a central text in terms of UK paramedic academia. Only other comparable journal is the online only British Paramedic Journal, which is very new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.75.193.66 (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now if only we had some independent reliable sources substantiating that claim... --Randykitty (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Jytdog (talk) 01:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:TOOSOON, no evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.