Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jourdan Younis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jourdan Younis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable as academic or businessman. "worked on" is a term that can mean anything-- DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree -- fails GNG and ACADEMIC. Quis separabit? 01:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He's briefly mentioned in two articles about other topics, the remainder are non-neutral bios. And, quite honestly, magna cum laude (3.70 grade average) at Cal Poly SLO is not a measure of notability. LaMona (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the (somewhat puffed up) accomplishments listed in the article rises to the level of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches didn't reveal anything which would indicate this person meets WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.