Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jota (Freemasonry)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jota (Freemasonry)[edit]

Procedural nomination; tagged with speedy for CSD:G1, patent nonsense, which it clearly isn't. Author posted that it is meant as serious article, and there are sources listed. Talk page lists notability and sourcing concerns. No recommendation. MCB 21:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. -- Not verifiable. The only source for this notion seems to be Jordon Maxwell, who does not appear to be notable himself. Google turns up nothing worth speaking of. If this were legit, obsessed Star Wars fans would be all over it. -- Shunpiker 22:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would expect much more about it if it truly were real. Hoax. SkierRMH,02:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Shunpiker. Don't think it is a hoax, but it is a perfect example of Fringe. Blueboar 03:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not sourced and a fringe theory, if not hoax. Chtirrell 03:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN fringe theory, inadequatly sourced (almost said 'barely sourced'), google turns up naught neither on the theory nor it's originator of any value. WegianWarrior 05:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. What utter nonsense. The Crying Orc 09:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: keep if verifiable, else delete. 69.140.173.15 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.