Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Dodd (presenter)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Dodd (presenter)[edit]

Joshua Dodd (presenter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is in question. TheEditster (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability not established by substantive sources. Reywas92Talk 23:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Sources understandable, he deserves a page more than most - it will only grow as he does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurugby54 (talkcontribs) 13:09, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I cannot see coverage in reliable sources.Tacyarg (talk) 23:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete First off, we don't predict that someone will gain notability per WP:CRYSTALBALL. Simply isn't sourced well enough to meet notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't seem to find any reliable sources about the subject on GNEWS. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Lapablo (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.