Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Zuckerman (musician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 20:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Zuckerman (musician)[edit]

Josh Zuckerman (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Promotional article of a non-notable musician, with no in-depth independent sources found. All his records have been independently released and not via major labels. The article was almost entirely created by two SPA editors, one of which has the username "Webmasterjoshzuckerman" – several times the article states "according to Zuckerman's website...", and indeed most of the "Early life" and "Early career" sections are straight WP:COPYVIO from the biography on the artist's own website [1]. There are a couple of interviews in gay community websites [2], [3], but these probably don't pass RS and in any case are primary sources that fail to corroborate most of the information present in the current article. Please note there is also a television and stage actor called Josh Zuckerman who frequently comes up in searches for this name. Richard3120 (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for Mr. Zuckerman's debut album because it is not notable and fails WP:NALBUM:

A Totally New Sensation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Richard3120 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: Fail WP:NMUSIC and WP:NALBUM all sources are WP:PRIMARY, no chart placings or major label signings. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - as an attempted promotion and written like a fan site with details that are irrelevant for the general reader. Except for some minor interviews at LGBT sites, nothing can be found on the singer or album beyond self-created social media and his own website. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as PROMO for a non-notable musician.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.