Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephine Harris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Harris[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: I am sorry but there is no way this meets notability. Someone inserted it and I just came across it. If this stands then I guess every 9/11 victim and many more survivors get their own pages. Quis separabit? 18:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clear WP:ONEEVENT case. Some media coverage yes, notability no. --Bejnar (talk) 19:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Bejnar on a clear WP:ONEEVENT. At this point, if the media coverage was enough to meet notability, then this article would be much longer with many more sources. User226 (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a one event situation — big event, inadvertent involvement, coverage related to subject's place as a witness rather an active participant. Also has aspects of WP:NOTMEMORIAL coming into play. My condolences to her family and friends. Carrite (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I once fought long and hard to keep an article about a 9/11 figure, Orio Palmer. This one does not meet our standards for inclusion. For the second time today, I agree completely with Carrite. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with above. Bondegezou (talk) 14:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.