Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Twist (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This has been expanded with 11,000 bytes and has 39 references. Geschichte (talk) 09:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Twist[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has not been the subject of any non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of Twist. Claims made in the article appear unverifable. Generally does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NM. Appears promotional also. Such-change47 (talk) 07:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some references for the cite needed tags have been added. Independent reviews for a recent work have been added. Seems to pass GNG and COMPOSER and NMUSICOTHER. Aoziwe (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article was promotional in the past but a lot of the promotional content has been rewritten over time to be more neutral. Contains enough valid sources to pass GNG as I see it. ZettaComposer (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:COMPOSER#1 and #4.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I suggest this article has now been WP:HEYed. Aoziwe (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.