Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph P. Mawra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chained Girls. Spartaz Humbug! 03:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph P. Mawra[edit]

Joseph P. Mawra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

two incidental references and a number of B-films probably doesn't pass notability BURLEY-XXII 08:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Three of the films he directed have their own articles, suggesting some notability, and in particular Chained Girls, which he also wrote, has achieved a degree of notoriety. PatGallacher (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate vote Spartaz Humbug! 08:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, only the second one below is a duplicate vote. PatGallacher (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No evidence of meeting WP:ENTERTAINER, or of the sustained, non-trivial coverage in reliable, third-party sources that would satisfy the more general guidelines at WP:N. Canadian Paul 14:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.