Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Loomis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Loomis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unambiguously WP:PROMO. Person does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Tracking the sources here, they're pretty much all deprecated sources like PR Web or paid ad placements/press releases from his company in various places. Not enough independent 3rd party coverage to show notability. Worth noting this is a recreation of a previous delete by a brand new account which suggests WP:COI issues. JamesG5 (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Don't think that [1] or [2] establish notability, and they're all I can find. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A poorly-written CV uploaded by a WP:SPA. (The previous instance was by another SPA.) Searches find brief in-role quotes since the previous AfD (in the WIRED news item), profiles from affiliated events and enterprises, which can confirm the subject's area of work, but I do not see the evidence of attained notability which would be needed to change my delete opinion from the previous AfD. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. --Devokewater@ 11:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, More sources are being added which definitely shows notability. Coifstwin (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC) — Coifstwin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

These new references are press releases by the subject's company (Newswire, Yahoo Finance), a posting by the subject (StartUpCity), a photo of the subject on the website of an associated enterprise (Incident Response Consortium), an item written by the CEO of his firm (EnterpriseTechSuccess), an in-role quote (Cnet), another in-role quote about a deal (CRN). Such primary sources do not demonstrate biographical notability here. AllyD (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia needs more than press releases to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Mostly due to WP:GNG. I'm not seeing a reason to keep. EverybodyEdits (talk) 23:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.