Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Kazer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Kazer[edit]

WWII soldier who won a Silver Star for bravery in one battle. Is that enough? I don't think so. Article is unsourced. NawlinWiki 01:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A google search of "Joseph Kazer" only produced mirrored wikipedia articles. Unsourced and marginally-notable. Shagmaestro 01:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Silver Star is a medal which is awarded to members from all 4 branches of the US military. According to this book by Chris Hedges, during WWII, just one branch, the US Army, awarded roughly 75,000 Silver Stars. This doesn't mean that this guy wasn't heroic (assuming that reliable sources turn up supporting the article) - just that he's not encyclopedically notable. Also, Wikipedia is not a memorial. Bwithh 01:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn,and primary contributor is User:Kazer72a, so possible COI Werdan7^{T @} 02:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:V with 4 non-wiki ghits. MER-C 02:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per notability. Hagerman^(talk) 02:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, missing multiple non-trivial published sources, also doesn't meet WP:V Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 03:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not even all Medal of Honor winners stay. --Dhartung | Talk 04:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Silver Star not enough to establish notability, entire article including this is not sourced in any case. Seraphimblade 06:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. ← ANAS ^Talk? 12:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it were in a book, I'd enjoy the passage, but unfortunately, Joseph Kazer doesn't have a place on Wikipedia - JNighthawk 12:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for notability concerns. TSO1D 15:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I hate sounding like a copy cat but defiantly not notable— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seadog.M.S (talk • contribs)
Delete. Looking beyond issues of notability, the article has a copyright mark at the bottom. Either it's copied from somewhere (and should be deleted), or it was contributed by someone who didn't understand the GFDL. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 17:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.