Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Horsfall Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - No valid reason for deletion - Being "too short, and not very noteworthy" isn't a valid reason whatsoever! - If any editor wants to renominate this I obviously have no objections. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Horsfall Johnson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Way too short, and not very noteworthy ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 00:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: ridiculous nomination - "too short" is never an acceptable argument - and we have numerous precedents per WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES of bishops being regarded as notable. St Anselm (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.