Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Hajjar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 18:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Hajjar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although this person appears to have published a few books, he does not appear to have been the subject of any reliable independent published works himself. The sources provided in the article are reviews of his works and do not discuss him; the "selected works" is a list of his publications. He does not appear to have received any accolades or awards, has not held any significant academic posts, and although he may have been a director of a journal (I could not independently confirm this), "director" is not the same as "head" or "chief editor" (the journal currently has five "directors"). I do not see enough material for this article to pass WP:NACADEMICS. KDS4444^Talk 19:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 19 June (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Some GS cites may pass WP:Prof#C1 in the very low cited field of theological scholarship. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC).;[reply]
KEEP 25 academical articles listed in JSTOR. other arguments for notablilty in article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Hajjar&action=edit# Clive Sweeting, 21 June 2014
Keep -- He looks like a scholar with a significant output. Since much of it is apparently in French, a lack of English coverage is unsurprising. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.