Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Griffin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Griffin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of an actor, with no strong claim to passing our notability criteria for actors. As always, every actor does not automatically get a notability freebie just because he's had acting roles -- the notability test requires evidence of the significance of his performances, such as notable acting awards and/or the reception of reliable source coverage about him. But this just says he exists, lists a bunch of roles (virtually all supporting, at that), cites absolutely no referencing for anything whatsoever, the end, and that's not how you make an actor notable. And even on a ProQuest search for referencing that may not have Googled, I just can't find any sources that would turn the tide here. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NACTOR. While he has quite a few acting credits, none of them seem to be significant roles and I couldn't find any sources which show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG none of the roles are significant roles to pass and hence fails WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.