Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Darcey-Alden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Darcey-Alden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An actor with one TV episode and one acting job in a 14-minute film. Fails WP:NACTOR. No independent, reliable references that are about him. His sister's article is also up for AfD. Prod was removed by sock/vandal claiming "15-minute of fame rule". Bgwhite (talk) 05:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the "film" is only 14 minutes long, how could they claim the "15-minutes of fame" award? Also, fails WP:NACTORS - has not appeared in "multiple, notable" anything; does not demonstrate a "large fan base" or "significant cult following"; nor has he made "unique, prolific or innovative contributions" to the field of entertainment. He's 10 years old, and the page reads like a press release - fails WP:RS. Яεñ99 (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We should be doubly cautious about BLPs on children. Lives can change and the very existence of such articles can be problematic. If he goes on to have an established career as an adult his early work can have a mention then. The likes of Hayley Mills should be a rare exception. --AJHingston (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NACTOR and AJHingston. -- Trevj (talk) 14:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for misunderstanding Wikipedia. Joseph and his sister are rising stars and I thought a page here might be appropriate. Unfortunately I cannot (it appears) delete this page myself so it must therefore go through this 'discussion' process for all to comment - sorry. Davesewell (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2013 (GMT)

Delete per WP:NACTOR. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.