Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph A. Amato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator and no delete votes. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph A. Amato[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Does not pass WP:AUTHOR, does not pass WP:GNG. Existing content is somewhat promotional and there are off-wiki indications that the article subject and/or his representative has contributed to it substantially. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:AUTHOR based on the number of scholarly reviews of his works. Here are a few [1][2][3][4][5]. Article needs clean up, not deletion. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few more reviews: [6][7][8][9][10] Thsmi002 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Searching JSTOR for his name found 38 reviews of 13 of his books. A slam-dunk pass of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David, Fantastic job incorporating the reviews into the article! Thsmi002 (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per others. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 05:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn My bad; I did not check JSTOR when I did the usual WP:BEFORE check. Thanks Thsmi002 and David Eppstein for finding those. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.