Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Ospina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ospina is credited with starting a new architectural movement. (non-admin closure) scope_creep^Talk 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Ospina[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely zero coverage, name mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 16:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I would hold the view that subject meets notability under WP:AUTHOR as their book has been cited in numerous other books over the last few decades. - Diddlydee123

@Diddlydee123: I have thought about this for a while, and don't have a response. I'll ask up at the help to determine if it is genuine criteria, as at the moment the article has references to support the BLP, as at the moment, the references don't support a BLP. They are name drops. scope_creep^Talk 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is only effectively one references that sufficiently in-depth to support a BLP, which is the Guardian reference. scope_creep^Talk 08:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ospina's book has been cited 45 times according to Google Scholar. scope_creep^Talk 12:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Qualifies under WP:NAUTHOR as the author of book (Housing Ourselves) that has been reliably credited as starting a significant architectural movement. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is solid keep. Nomination Withdrawn. scope_creep^Talk 19:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.