Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Luis Ortiz Tellez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Luis Ortiz Tellez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Reviewed online sources and could not find any significant independent content to substantiate notability. Page appears to have been created by the subject himself and is in the form of a personal resume. Subject is an artist and teacher not of encyclopedic distinction as far as I can tell. Author has contributed some other useful edits, but this self-created page does not appear to be justifiable. Shorn again (talk) 23:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Definitely COI editing. His SVA bio lists several awards that would establish notability (Presidential Design Award, National Endowment for the Arts; AIGA), but I couldn't find any references to these awards aside from his personal biographies. Theredproject (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.