Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Cordero de Torres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

José Cordero de Torres[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From what I'm able to find (which is nothing) I'm seeing no assertion of notability and a Google search pulls up nothing for notability. Dusti^*poke* 03:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, a google search does give a few results, such as http://www.catedralescatolicas.com/?tag=catedral-de-sevilla and http://www.arhuertas.es/personajes.html . These don't seem as very good WP:RS, but no indication that the info would be fraudulent. Considering the fact that this person lived in 18th century, these mentions do indicate a degree of notability. However, I'm concerned that there are no google book hits. --Soman (talk) 11:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say they aren't good reliable sources. Perhaps this article is better for the es.wikipedia. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 20:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.