Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José António Falcão

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

José António Falcão[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotion, without encyclopedic relevance.--Rtws123 (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:José António Falcão--Rtws123 (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Portugese version of this article contains references of significant coverage. Its prose is quite promotional, but the subject still meets GNG. Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 09:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The subject certainly meets WP:GNG as Falcão received a lot of coverage as one can see on the portuguese article. Nonetheless the current article on english wikipedia lacks sources. Lechatjaune (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep almost certainly a pass of WP:NACADEMIC also given the awards and directorships. - Astrophobe (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG and WP:NEXIST. gidonb (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.