Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordon Hodges (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 07:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jordon Hodges[edit]

Jordon Hodges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The latest attempt to use Wikipedia to promote Hodges. Once again it's sourced to passing mentions, listings and a non mention plus imdb, a press release and a marketplace. The one exception is the local interest piece on a locally made film. The only thing changed since last deletion is the release of Sand Castles (at afd) and some awards for that film, but none of theose awards are major awards. A look at sourcing at time of nomination.

1 listing only
2 marketplace
3 short piece with trivial coverage of Hodges
4 article title changed to deceive. passing mention only. Does not verify claim made (only supporting, not starred)
5 does not verify claim made, no mention of Hodges or Mary’s Buttons
6 imdb
7 local interest piece
8 listing only, does not verify claim of premier
9 press release
10 listing only, does not verify claim of award
11 mention only, does not verify claim of award

Hodges is still not notable. He lacks significant roles in multiple notable productions, only one significant role in a bluelinked film and that's also up at afd. He lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources WP:GNG. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a repost from "an Executive of Oceanus Pictures which owns Sand Castles" [1] using another sockpuppet (SPI). Part of their promotional campaign [2] " That is part of a marketing game plan. It's on IMDb, Wiki, we have a website, all we want for now." Stop rewarding bad faithed editing. Delete Spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 10:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 10:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 10:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 10:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If we ignore WP:ADHOM arguments or poor claims and admitted transparencies of two years ago, we may look instead to the topic itself to determine if actor/filmmaker Jordon Hodges OR his works have enough coverage to meet WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG and WP:BIO... or not. If the article had been created by an experienced editor, would we gauge it more harshly or less? Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per coverage by multiple independent sources such as this [3]. Sand Castles is a notable mainstream independent film that afd's consensus is quite clear. Valoem talk contrib 13:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • An indiscriminate local interest puff piece that lacks any depth of coverage about Hodges. I disagree with your analysis of the Sand Castles afd. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.