Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordans Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jordans Law[edit]

Nothing on Google for this aphorism, which sounds awfully similar to Godwin's Law in any event. Article is unlikely to grow beyond its present size anyway. Daniel Case 21:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per non-existant. Any sort of respected law is published in many journals, and this one doesn't even show on google. --Tony St 22:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete godwins law wannabe ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Feezo (Talk) 22:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete attempted protologism. Bobby1011 00:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.