Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Johnson-Hinds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sort of WP:SOFTDELETE given that it's two delete and one keep case (without clear cut evidence) and one allow userfication; thus, if someone wants userfication they can ask on WP:REFUND. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Johnson-Hinds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR. Has had a few bit roles and one recurring role. Meters (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Via Google you find more references, seems ok for WP:ACTORS because of his role roles in several television shows. TulongaN (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: TulongaN (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
- I have no problem withdrawing this if you can show that he has had "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I did not see multiple significant roles. Meters (talk) 06:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm concerned with a number of SPAs editing this article to add similarly overinflated claims of his roles. Bit parts and a few recurring roles are written up as major roles or even starring roles. As I said, if there is sufficient reliably sourced evidence of significant roles I have no problem withdrawing this nomination. I'm not seeing it, and the continued push to overinflate claims is not only not convincing me, it is making me think that this is a case of socking or meatpuppetry. Meters (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing NACTOR and GNG. He's had a few recurring roles, plus a part in the latest Robocop movie, but that's not enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Allow move to userspace if anyone wants to keep the article there. The subject may be getting close to notability, and if he clearly passes the threshold, the article can be moved back to the mainspace. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Last
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe )³  22:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.