Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Cox (tennis)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Cox (tennis)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NTENNIS Mayumashu (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 09:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reaching a Junior Grand Slam final is not enough, you have to win it. Ravendrop (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The reason for deletion seems weak. Reaching the final of a huge senior tennis tournament and also being ranked makes you notable in the world of tennis.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What senior level tournament has he reached the final in? Ravendrop (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowIG (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:NTENNIS. See His ITF profile. As a junior, his highest ranking was only 36 and he had no grand slam titles. Reaching the finals may be notable in the world of tennis but Wikipedia has specific standards for junior tennis players and he does not meet them. --Crunch (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet any requirement for notability, neither he's winner of any junior Grand Slam title nor he is in top junior players list. Bill william compton (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.