Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jor (music)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jor (music)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough detail or citation to specify having a page Wasabi,the,one (talk) 22:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as these are not valid arguments for deletion, article can be easily improved, and I don't quite understand why this was nominated. Sro23 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a fundamental concept in Hindustani music, so we should have an article on it. Admittedly the current article is inadequate, but that's a reason to expand it, not to delete. --Deskford (talk) 22:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the article mentions that the topic in question forms part of a raga – I don't know enough about the topic to say for certain, but would it make sense to include it as part of that article? Richard3120 (talk) 04:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It forms part of the performance of a raga, along with e.g. alap and jhala, and indeed sometimes the term "raga" is loosely used to refer to performance, but more strictly a raga is a mode, and that is what our article raga covers. Better to cover one subject per article, I think. --Deskford (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to be notable within its topic. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 18:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.