Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joo Laka Taka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Concerns about systemic bias are possibly justified, but cannot be dealt with in individual AfDs; a broader discussion may be warranted. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joo Laka Taka[edit]

Joo Laka Taka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM, and lacks reliable sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 10:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 14:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- I am worried about systemic bias concerns of the attempts of the past several weeks to mass delete older Indian films. Reviews of these films may exist in other languages and in non-online media, given their age. This film seems very easily verifiable and it seems to be that likely coverage *exists*. matt91486 (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.