Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Shipley (writer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Shipley (writer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

added 07:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I may not be doing the right searches, but I can find no evidence of notability for Jonathan Shipley (writer) or his work. The biographical article is referenced to a variety of sources which are either unreliable or lack independence, and the other two articles are referenced solely to Shipley's own works.

These articles were all created by one single-purpose account, whose only page creations are of these articles and a related template. This may be a promotional exercise. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — I'm also coming up rather empty on reliable sources after going through WP:BEFORE. Nothing I found even came close to WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. The sources provided are crap and some (if not most) do not support the claims made. The WP:LOTSOFSOURCES are misleading. This is just a farm of external links on non-notable writing and it should go. JFHJr (㊟) 06:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed one more page in this set: the unreferenced Sharlverse list. Have just added it to the nomination. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - found some other Shipleys, but hardly anything usable on this one. It certainly looks like publicity, whoever wrote it. WP:GNG is nowhere in sight. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. None of the sources on the articles assert enough notability to warrant these remaining on Wikipedia and I found nothing via a search that would change that.Tokyogirl79 (talk)
Delete All for failing WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.