Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Rosenbaum's Alternate 100
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 08:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jonathan Rosenbaum's Alternate 100[edit]
Critics frequently make "best of" lists. This one does not seem notable enough to include in an encylopedia. The AFI's list has a bit more clout because of the controversy it raised, but even it might be deleted from Wikipedia, in my opinion. Jeremy Butler 19:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NN Danny Lilithborne 02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the link and basic info but not the list itself into Jonathan Rosenbaum MLA 09:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lists like this have been deleted as COPYVIO for a while now, this one ought to as well. Carlossuarez46 21:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Probable copyvio. Stifle (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.