Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Potts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Potts[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. On further research, can't find reliable sources that talks about this person. GeeJay24 (talk) 03:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - On Google search, there were no reliable sources for this subject that showed up. 210.178.110.229 (talk) 04:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could not find evidence of substantial coverage after doing a Google search. It seems like that this is an instance where an actor has received steady work, but has not attracted any public attention or interest (at least in the form of articles). He has a respectable career, and I find Beverly Hills Teens to be oddly fascinating lol, but there is not enough coverage to support him having his own article. Aoba47 (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.