Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Pekar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Pekar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I accepted this draft at AfC some years back as a rookie, mainly based on the Emmy, but I no longer think they pass the WP:NBIO criteria - certainly not WP:GNG, nor WP:NACTOR as no significant roles. It could be argued that they pass WP:ANYBIO due to the Emmy but that is not an automatic pass. Author is a single-purpose editor and likely to be autobiographical. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Tennessee. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not much sourcing, and not much of a career. An internet search brings up IMDB and this Wikipedia article, but that's about it. — Maile (talk) 01:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.