Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Craik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting also the concerns that this article is a hoax. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Craik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines or specifically WP:NHOCKEY guidelines Alaney2k (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: G3 as a hoax article. Holy crap, did this one fall through the cracks, given that it was created four years ago. In any event, I see no evidence that this chump exists. The two "sources" both link to a Calgary co-ed rec league, and neither actually mention him. No team named the "Phantoms" has existed in the NAHL in seven years, and in any event the NAHL a Junior A league for which someone born in 1990 would have aged out of well before 2012. No "Jonathan Craik" comes up in the Internet Hockey Database listings, and IHDB covers levels down to teenage amateurs and semi-pros. No "Jonathan Craik" ever played for the University of Calgary or for the Horse Lake Chiefs. Article created by a SPA for whom this was his only edit. Ravenswing 04:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. And Ravenswing may well be correct about it being a hoax, in which case speedy delete would be appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Can't find any mention anywhere about him. Pretty positive its a hoax. -DJSasso (talk) 11:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.