Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bateson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jonathan Bateson[edit]
- Jonathan Bateson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails notability criteria as he hasn't played in a fully professional league or at the highest possible level. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 03:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 04:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Blackburn Rovers F.C. is an English Premier League football club. --Eastmain (talk) 04:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct, however he has never played for Blackburn Rovers, he has only played for Blackburn Rovers Reserves and Blackburn Rovers Youth Team, neither of which confer any form of notability whatsoever -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No senior team appearances, and winning some "skill skool" competition isn't enough for notability on other grounds. Vickser (talk) 06:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE as has not competed in a fully professional league. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wiki project football says a first team appearance is required for notability. No prejudice to recreation when he gets his first game. nancy (talk) 07:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Just to note, WP:FOOTY guidelines are not policy (and can't be a reason to delete) and are not even universally accepted, but WP:ATHLETE is. He fails WP:ATHLETE anyway so moot point, just for future reference. Rasadam (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am aware of the status of WP:FOOTY but did you realise that WP:ATHLETE is not a policy either - it is a guideline. nancy (talk) 08:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh hmm, I was told otherwise before. I see "This page is a WikiProject essay on notability. It contains the advice and/or opinions of one or more WikiProjects on how they interpret notability within their area of expertise. It is not a policy or guideline, and editors are free to, but not obliged to follow it during XfD's." at the top of WP:FOOTY and I see the standard official looking Notability guideline header under WP:ATHLETE Rasadam (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am aware of the status of WP:FOOTY but did you realise that WP:ATHLETE is not a policy either - it is a guideline. nancy (talk) 08:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't particularly agree with the rules, but he fails them. If we want to be consistent (not OTHERCRAP, just consistent), he fails to pass WP:ATHLETE despite having a professional contract. Rasadam (talk) 08:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Who? Clearly NN Dreamspy (talk) 19:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 57 19:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:ATHLETE. --Jimbo[online] 08:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.