Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Howard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 01:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jon Howard[edit]
- Jon Howard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability is not inherited. I do not see this individual passing WP:N and see no reliable sources indicating notability. Basket of Puppies 19:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 20:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The information in the first portion of the article is inherited notability. The second part is that which makes Jon Howard notable (songwriting credits as an individual). Please take note of this. --Jaunsk (talk) 20:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Due to his involvement in two wholly separate bands with clearly established notability; it makes merging the information difficult. I expect sources could be found in places like christian rock publications. -Verdatum (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve: According #6WP:BAND, a musician is notable if it "is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles". Jon Howard played in two notable bands: Dizmas and Stellar Kart. So, I think it is sufficient to keep the article. However, the article is too little and has nothing about Jon Howard independently of his bands. I suggest to keep and expand it.Victor Silveira (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Mr. Silveira. Meets notability requirements. Ikip (talk) 02:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per all the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.