Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Erlichman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Erlichman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of a television journalist, which is written more like a prosified résumé than an encyclopedia article. As always, television journalists are not granted an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia just because they exist -- they must be reliably sourced as the subject of media coverage, in sources other than their own paycheque provider, to be eligible for an article. For added bonus, there's a conflict of interest here as the article was originally created by User:Clesley, which corresponds to the name of the subject's wife. Which is not that surprising, because this is one of the longest and most detailed articles I've ever seen without a single source present to actually support any of it. Bearcat (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nomination. RelaxedTim (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nomination. - NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 14:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable TV journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.