Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jollees Cabaret Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jollees Cabaret Club[edit]
- Jollees Cabaret Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG, hardly anything in gnews [1] despite its claims to fame in the article. LibStar (talk) 06:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —LibStar (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pmlineditor ∞ 17:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too bad, most clubs/discos/cabarets have very interesting histories that never get documented. Miami33139 (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I'm sure gnews would have more on this place if internet (as we know it) existed 30-40 or even 20 years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snorre (talk • contribs) 23:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Verifiability is a core requirement whether we like it or not Miami33139 (talk) 23:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.