Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint Social Welfare Institute
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 00:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Joint Social Welfare Institute[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joint Social Welfare Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, does not cite any sources JTZegers (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Costa Rica. AllyD (talk) 07:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I get dozens of news articles in the last year alone ([1]). Furius (talk) 08:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:GOOGLEHITS. LibStar (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- "Note further that searches using Google's specialty tools, such as Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News, are more likely to return reliable sources that can be useful in improving articles than the default Google web search." Which is what I did. Furius (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:GOOGLEHITS. LibStar (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No assertion of notability, so fails WP:GNG. Fully unsourced. UtherSRG (talk) 01:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do this again, then. IMAS is the main social welfare agency in the Costa Rica. Here is its Spanish wikipedia page, which is long and cites sixteen sources [2]. Here is a newspaper article in La Nacion about the dismissal of the IMAS president in 2002, Here is an article reporting the comments of their president about government policy, Here is an article about the resignation of the IMAS president in 2007, Here is an article from 2007 reporting on changes made by the institution to child welfare allowances, here is an article about the appointment of a new president in 2016. From the last month or so here is a story about a funding decision made by IMAS, here is a story about changes to IMAS subsidies in response to inflation, and here is another story about that. It's discussed on pages 103-104 of this book on the government of Costa Rica, in several places in this book on poverty reduction, on pg. 57 on this book on Costa Rican politics, is the subject of this academic article, and this one. GNG is well and truly met. Furius (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be great if some of these sources found their way into the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.