Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnson Mansion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson Mansion[edit]

Johnson Mansion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that this building exists or that the gruesome events described within the article ever happened. I performed a thorough search and failed to find any sources to verify the contents of this article, so I suspect it does not meet WP:GNG or worse, could be a hoax. Altamel (talk) 23:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for failing WP:V. No evidence found that the place or the events there are real. The article claims extensive news media coverage but no trace found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - WP:GNG - Lack of reliable sources. I was unable to find any sources to support this article. - Taketa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Nothing to support the claims. - Takeaway (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as probably Halloween prank. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.Esprit15d • talkcontribs 02:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I believe some topics have mostly offline sources but if this existed there would be at least mentions of this in g-books or newspapers. Can't find anything. --Oakshade (talk) 05:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.