Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Saade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Johnny Saade[edit]
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Johnny Saade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable subject Beirutbio (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge with Jacques Saadé at Saadé family. The feud between the two brothers seems to have generated significant news coverage. Jfire (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or mergewith Jacques Saadé at Saadé family. The news coverage relates to CMA-CGM a company that was founded by Jacques Saadé and later became one the world biggest. I wonder if the fact that a person is involved in a legal dispute with a notable person automatically qualifies for notability... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.5 (talk) 17:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no point in merging articles. Someone (i might be doing it)should instead improve the article about Jacques Saade and mention the legal woes related to the CGM privatization. The feud with his brother Johnny is anecdotical and does not justify a paragraph on Johnny Saade businesses, while the real big story is the presumed link between former president Chirac and Jacques Saade and the scandal related to the privatisation of CGM for 1 symbolic french franc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yajabalmayhezzakrih (talk • contribs) 23:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.