Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Kim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Scott Mac (Doc) 22:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Johnny Kim[edit]
- Johnny Kim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One more that I tried to save from the current brouhaha, but looks pretty not notable despite my best efforts. You can check this version for what the article looked like before it was gutted. It's a biography of an up-and-coming actor-director-producer who has had bit parts in major films and self-produced two minor films; unfortunately, there are thousands of people like that in Hollywood. Best of luck to him, but we need some more attention paid to him by Wikipedia:reliable sources before we can write an article. GRuban (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable actor. MBisanz talk 04:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN actor who fails GNG. JBsupreme (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mmm not sure about this one. His imdb page shows he has appeared in numerous notable films but the web coverage of reliable sources seems pretty low. In english that is. I'd be certain that a google search under the Korean name might surprise us folks. I'll ask PC78... Damn ugly article at the moment... Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator, still no genuinely useful sources, and these look largely like bit roles on the whole. Risker (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.