Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Hurtado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Hurtado[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A resume of a professor. Not a hint of notability. No third-party sources. Twri (talk) 02:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 03:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original prodder. Abductive (reasoning) 04:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minimal GS cites. Article created too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. There's no evidence presented within the article that he passes any of the criteria of WP:PROF or WP:GNG and I wasn't able to turn up any such evidence by searching Google scholar and Google news. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete -- using "publish or perish", I came up with an h-index of 11 (with no highly cited papers). This isn't terribly impressive for someone at associate level, and there's nothing else to go on that I can find. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WoS shows 20 peer-reviewed papers, but the citations are pretty low: 7, 6, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2... for an h-index of 4. These numbers are not characteristic of a notable associate professor. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - nothing to indicate he passes WP:PROF. Cocytus [»talk«] 17:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.