Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Castle (Adult entertainer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Johnny Castle (Adult entertainer)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johnny Castle (Adult entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP, supported by database entries (caution when reviewing - NSFW) unreliable sources. Doing a BEFORE was complicated by the existence of a number of famous people of this name, but I didn't find any reliable, independent sources giving significant coverage. Girth Summit (blether) 17:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pennsylvania. Girth Summit (blether) 17:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
All references used in this article are reliable (or at-least have at one point been considered reliable) it firstly uses an article from AVN themselves and the remainder are from the same website used in the Manuel Ferrara page (the internet adult film database) (LaVOZSA)
- Per this discussion at RSN, it seems pretty clear that the community does not consider IADB to be reliable - certainly not for a BLP. Mentions in databases don't really amount to significant coverage for the purposes of establishing notability, even if it were reliable. Celebsagewiki.com definitely does not sound like a reliable source for use on a BLP. So we are left with AVN publishing a press release about themselves giving an award to someone, which is not independent of the event. In other words - no sources that are independent, reliable, and give the subject significant depth of coverage. Girth Summit (blether) 13:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:BIO 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 15:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as there is a lack of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources so that WP:GNG is not passed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not notable. BD2412 T 06:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.