Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnathan Staci Kim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Johnathan Staci Kim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable autobiography (~~created and~~ mostly edited by Jonathankim1971 that fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. No sign of significant coverage in independent sources and article claims he is "best known" for role as shopkeeper who has an orange stolen from him. Being best known for a very limited role in an indie film is not " significant roles in multiple notable films" as the standard asks. The Village Voice citation is unverifiable as given and the probable actual target[1] doesn't mention the actor. The New York Times citation is similarly missing and a search of the Times (including archives) finds no matches. Other searches similarly empty but for IMDB page. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Edited to correct article history claim. Apologies Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Insufficiently sourced, written primarily by the subject. Doesn't meet notability guidelines. I've also asked for a block of the self-promotional account. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:NACTOR and the NYTimes reference is obviously fake. Dammitkevin (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not fake, just dead. I added a link from Internet Archive.--Auric talk 21:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Auric found the probably intended target for the NYT reference I called "missing" above and it is not a Times article but a rebranded slurp from All-Movie Guide. This does not add to the subject's notability, but thanks to Auric for finding it. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "Kids" reference does mention him, but just as a credit.--Auric talk 22:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 20:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficiently sourced. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 22:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.